<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Library Basement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathansmith.me/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog</link>
	<description>Keep studying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The benefits of free data by Mike Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2010/02/the-benefits-of-free-data/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1753#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find it right now, but John Hobbins of ancienthebrewpoetry.typepad.com has written at lesat one post on this topic &amp; scholarship that is extremely thought provoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find it right now, but John Hobbins of ancienthebrewpoetry.typepad.com has written at lesat one post on this topic &amp; scholarship that is extremely thought provoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The benefits of free data by Weston Ruter</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2010/02/the-benefits-of-free-data/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Weston Ruter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1753#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I love your blog posts :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your blog posts <img src='http://nathansmith.me/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morphological v. Semantic Parsing and Databases by Weston Ruter</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2010/02/morphological-v-semantic-parsing-and-databases/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Weston Ruter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1730#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I agree that we should preserve the morphological analyses that were originally devised (storing the original parsings verbatim) and then devise methods of mapping between the different systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we should preserve the morphological analyses that were originally devised (storing the original parsings verbatim) and then devise methods of mapping between the different systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripture and APIs by Nathan Smith</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2010/02/scripture-and-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1721#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Sure, I&#039;ll generalize it a bit and send you an email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll generalize it a bit and send you an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scripture and APIs by Weston Ruter</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2010/02/scripture-and-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Weston Ruter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1721#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Nice writeup! Good summary of what&#039;s happening right now. Would you be interested on posting a version of this to the Open Scriptures blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writeup! Good summary of what&#8217;s happening right now. Would you be interested on posting a version of this to the Open Scriptures blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Hobby: Doctrinal Statements by Nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2009/11/my-hobby-doctrinal-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1312#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Surprisingly, some don&#039;t even bother to mention the resurrection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, some don&#8217;t even bother to mention the resurrection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inaccessible Scholarship by Nathan Smith</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2009/08/inaccessible-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1173#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Good news. Thanks for the update, Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news. Thanks for the update, Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inaccessible Scholarship by Mike Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2009/08/inaccessible-scholarship/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1173#comment-84</guid>
		<description>This just as appeared as a trackback to my post...and Oxford has since lowered the price to $135.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just as appeared as a trackback to my post&#8230;and Oxford has since lowered the price to $135.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Committee Translations by Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér (mjjzf)</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2009/08/committee-translations/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér (mjjzf)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1186#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I have some experience with workgroups translating literature, and frankly this has given me the impression that shared translation work makes for stylistic inconsistencies compared to a personal translation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some experience with workgroups translating literature, and frankly this has given me the impression that shared translation work makes for stylistic inconsistencies compared to a personal translation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Committee Translations by Bobby Grow</title>
		<link>http://nathansmith.me/blog/2009/08/committee-translations/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Grow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathansmith.me/blog/?p=1186#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I think committees are smart. They would seem to provide some checks and balances, given the typical of disparate theological traditions represented in Christendom. If only we could bring together committees when doing theology and developing doctrine &quot;for the Church.&quot;

It is interesting that there is an apparent ecumenism with translation teams, and not so much when it comes to arguing over the finer points of Christian doctrine.

Anyway, given the reality of &quot;interpretive decisions&quot; when doing translation; I am more comfortable with committees (I think Paul&#039;s &quot;body&quot; analogy could be used here, in favor of commmittees).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think committees are smart. They would seem to provide some checks and balances, given the typical of disparate theological traditions represented in Christendom. If only we could bring together committees when doing theology and developing doctrine &#8220;for the Church.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is interesting that there is an apparent ecumenism with translation teams, and not so much when it comes to arguing over the finer points of Christian doctrine.</p>
<p>Anyway, given the reality of &#8220;interpretive decisions&#8221; when doing translation; I am more comfortable with committees (I think Paul&#8217;s &#8220;body&#8221; analogy could be used here, in favor of commmittees).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
